Contact: +91-9711224068
  • Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
International Journal of Psychology Sciences
Peer Reviewed Journal

Vol. 7, Issue 1, Part A (2025)

Perseverative thinking among young adults based on age and gender: Comparative study

Author(s):

Samaya Prabhakar S, J Sujathamalini, K Gunasekaran and A Pandimeenal

Abstract:

Perseverative thinking involves having thought about the unfavourable thoughts, emotions and feelings repeatedly. Young adults are defined as those who are between the ages of 18 and 26. They were characterized by uncertainty, which generates negative views about the past and the future due to various events they encounter during this phase of life. The aim of the study was to identify the level of Perseverative Thinking and mean difference of Perseverative Thinking based on their age and gender. Survey method was used in this study. 162 young adults as samples were selected through Simple Random Sampling technique. The findings showed that level of Perseverative thinking was mostly moderate in young adults and their mean score of young adults not differ significantly in terms of age and gender. Mostly Young adults possess perseverative thinking are moderately affected by unfavourable events or circumstances and are average impact by the negative thoughts or situations. The results of the study implied the need for intervention as if it gets worse the young adults will demonstrate behavioral and psychological. The study also serves as a lime light to train the professional to provide therapies and conduct counselling sessions to young adults to overcome perseverative thinking to reduce their thoughts about the unfavourable thoughts, emotions and feeling repeatedly.

Pages: 51-54  |  163 Views  92 Downloads


International Journal of Psychology Sciences
How to cite this article:
Samaya Prabhakar S, J Sujathamalini, K Gunasekaran and A Pandimeenal. Perseverative thinking among young adults based on age and gender: Comparative study. Int. J. Psychol. Sci. 2025;7(1):51-54. DOI: 10.33545/26648377.2025.v7.i1a.74